CONTENT OF NUMBER
AND SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES
EURASIAN LAW JOURNAL №6(169)2022
PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Ragulin A.V.
Regulation of the right of advocate to take other actions consistent with the legislation of the Russian Federation
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EUROASIAN SPACE
Kudryavtsev V.L.
Constitutional-legal criminal proceedings: the myth or the legal reality?
Blazhnova L.A.
Political games with a modern jury of assessors
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
The international law of self-defense of states
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
International law and the US doctrine of preventive self-defense
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
International law on the use of military force by the state against non-state actors
PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Ragulin A.V.
Regulation of the right of advocate to take other actions consistent with the legislation of the Russian Federation
On the basis of the analysis of regulations, scientific literature and research data conducted by the author, the problems of legal regulation of professional right of advocate to act, not inconsistent with the provisions of applicable law.
On the basis of the analysis of regulations, scientific literature and research data conducted by the author, the problems of legal regulation of professional right of advocate to act, not inconsistent with the provisions of applicable law.
Keywords: professional rights of advocate, other actions consistent with the legislation, advocate.
1. Agutin A.V. Vzaimodejstvie chastnogo detektiva s advokatom po zashhite zakonnyh interesov uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo un-ta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. – N. Novgorod, 1997.
2. Advokatura Rossii: Uchebnik / Pod red. S.S. Jur'eva. – M.: Jurajt, 2011.
3. Belorusov V., Shishov E. Chastnyj detektiv v ugolovnom processe: nekotorye aspekty problemy // Ugolovnyj process. – 2001. – # 2.
4. Burobin V. Tajna sledstvija i interesy doveritelja // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2007. – # 1 (004).
5. Volkolup (Gladysheva) O.V. Sistema ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i problema ee sovershenstvovanija. –SPb., 2003.
6. Galoganov A.P. Advokatskaja tajna. Soderzhanie. Konfidencial'nye i nekonfidencial'nye svedenija, poluchennye pri osushhestvlenii professional'noj dejatel'nosti // Advokatura. Gosudarstvo. Obshhestvo: Cb.materialov VI ezhegodnoj nauch.-prakt. konferencii, 2009 g. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2009.
7. Grudcyna L.Ju. Garantii nezavisimosti, samoupravlenija i finansirovanija advokatskoj dejatel'nosti // Novyj juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – # 1.
8. Gus'kova A.P. K voprosu o nekotoryh kriminalisticheskih aspektah professional'noj dejatel'nosti advokata-zashhitnika po ugolovnym delam // Professional'naja dejatel'nost' advokata kak ob"ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovanija. – Ekaterinburg, 2002.
9. Zherebcova T.I. O celesoobraznosti pravovogo regulirovanija vzaimootnoshenij zashhitnika i chastnogo detektiva // Chernye dyry v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve. – 2004. – # 2.
10. Zakomoldin A.V. Problemy okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v ugolovnom processe Rossii. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009.
11. Ignatov D.S. Kriminalisticheskie aspekty dejatel'nosti advokata-zashhitnika po predstavleniju dokazatel'stv sudu // Taktika, metodika i strategija professional'noj zashhity. – Ekaterinburg, 2002.
12. Karjakin E.A. Formirovanie istinnosti prigovora v sostjazatel'nom sudebnom proizvodstve: voprosy teorii i praktiki / Pod nauch. red. A.P. Gus'kovoj. – M.:Jurlitinform, 2007.
13. Kruchinin Ju. Advokat-zashhitnik i uslugi chastnyh detektivov // Rossijskaja justicija. – 1998. – # 4.
14. Kucherena A.G. Ponjatie i sushhnost' obshhestvennogo (grazhdanskogo, demokraticheskogo) kontrolja dejatel'nosti organov publichnoj vlasti // Pravo i zhizn'. – 2013. –# 175 (1).
15. Kucherena A.G. K voprosu o pravovom polozhenii Obshhestvennoj palaty Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravo i zhizn'. – 2013. – # 176 (2).
16. Larin A.M. Dokazyvanie i predprocessual'naja dejatel'nost' zashhitnika // Advokatura i sovremennost'. – M., 1987.
17. Osobennosti predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija prestuplenij, osushhestvljaemogo s uchastiem advokata /A.A. Levi, M.V. Ignat'eva, E.I. Kapica. – M.: Jurlitin-form, 2003.
18. Pressa kak pomoshhnik advokata // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2009. – # 10.
19. Ragulin A.V. Professional'nye prava advokata-zashhitnika v Rossijskoj Federacii i zarubezhnyh gosudarstvah: Monografija. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2012.
20. Semenov V. Nuzhen li chastnyj syshhik v ugolovnom processe? // Zakonnost'. – 2005. – # 7.
21. Semencov V.A., Skrebec G.G. Uchastie advokata-zashhitnika v formirovanii dokazatel'stv na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009.
22. Smolenskij M.B. Advokatskaja dejatel'nost' i advokatura Rossijskoj Federacii. – Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2004. – (Vysshee obrazovanie).
23. Stremovskij V.A. Uchastniki predvaritel'nogo sledstvija v sovetskom ugolovnom processe. – Rostov n/D, 1966.
24. Tarasov A.A. Ob advokatskoj dejatel'nosti i sledstvennoj tajne // Sootnoshenie dosudebnogo i sudebnogo proizvodstva: voprosy prava, processa i kriminalistiki: Materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauch.-prakt. konferencii (16 fevralja 2006 g.). – Omsk, 2006.
25. Shejfer S.A. Ispol'zovanie neprocessual'nyh poznavatel'nyh meroprijatij v dokazyvanii po ugolovnomu delu // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1997. – # 9.
26. Shejfer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovanija. – M.: Norma, 2008.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EUROASIAN SPACE
Kudryavtsev V.L.
Constitutional-legal criminal proceedings: the myth or the legal reality?
This article explores the question, what is «constitutional-legal, criminal proceedings» - is this a myth or legal reality, as well as the related disclosure of this basic issue of the problem.
This article explores the question, what is «constitutional-legal, criminal proceedings» - is this a myth or legal reality, as well as the related disclosure of this basic issue of the problem.
Key words: constitutional law, criminal proceedings, the decisions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the constitutional-legal criminal proceedings.
1. Barenbojm P.D., Gadzhiev G.A., Lafitskij V.M.,Mau V.A. Konstitucionnaja jekonomika. – M., 2005.
1. Barenbojm P.D., Gadzhiev G.A., Lafitskij V.M.,Mau V.A. Konstitucionnaja jekonomika. – M., 2005.
2. Bojkov A.D. Tret'ja vlast' v Rossii. – Kniga vtoraja. Prodolzhenie reform. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2002.
3. Zor'kin V.D. Vstupitel'naja stat'ja // Ugolovnyj process: Uchebnik / A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskij; pod obshh. red. A.V. Smirnova. – 5-e izd., pererab. – M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012.
4. Kudrjavcev V.L. Advokat-zashhitnik ili prosto zashhitnik? // Advokat. – 2006. – # 2.
5. Kudrjavcev V.L. Konstitucionno-pravovye osnovy instituta kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2007.
6. Kudrjavcev V.L. Konstitucionno-pravovoj institut kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossijskoj Federacii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2008. – # 2.
7. Kudrjavcev V.L. Koncepcii realizacii konstitucionno-pravovogo instituta kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve //Rossijskaja justicija. – 2008. – # 11.
8. Kudrjavcev V.L. Realizacija konstitucionno-pravovogo instituta kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v dejatel'nosti advokata (zashhitnika) v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoreticheskie osnovy i problemy obespechenija: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra
jurid. nauk. – M., 2008.
9. Kudrjavcev V.L. Problemy okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v kontekste pravovyh pozicij Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii // Konstitucionno-pravovye problemy ugolovnogo prava i processa: Sb. materialov mezhdunar. nauch. konferencii. Sankt-Peterburg, 30–31 oktjabrja 2009 g. / Sost. K.B. Kalinovskij. – SPb.: Severo-Zapadnyj filial Rossijskoj akademii pravosudija, 2010.
10. Kudrjavcev V.L. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovanija processual'noj formy predvaritel'nogo rassledovanija v kontekste sostjazatel'nyh nachal ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Sankt-Peterburg.6–8 oktjabrja 2010 g. – SPb., 2011.
11. Kudrjavcev V.L. Nekotorye problemnye voprosy dopuska v kachestve zashhitnikov advokata i inyh lic v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federacii //Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2012. – # 1.
12. Konstitucionnaja jekonomika / Otv. red. G.A. Gadzhiev. – M.: Justicinform, 2010.
13. Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij k Konstitucii Rossijskoj Federacii. – 3-e izd., dop. i pererab. –M.: Spark, 2004.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EUROASIAN SPACE
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EUROASIAN SPACE
Blazhnova L.A.
Political games with a modern jury of assessors
In article the tendences of reduction of jurisdiction of court with participation of jurors that contradicts the constitutional norms and the international practice is considered and can be explained with only political reasons.
In article the tendences of reduction of jurisdiction of court with participation of jurors that contradicts the constitutional norms and the international practice is considered and can be explained with only political reasons.
Keywords: jury of assessors, politician of the state, reforming of judicial system.
1. Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. – 5-e izd. – T. 42. – M., 1970.
1. Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. – 5-e izd. – T. 42. – M., 1970.
2. Sangadzhiev B.V. Garantii nezavisimosti sudej kak osnova jeffektivnoj organizacii sistemy sudebnoj vlasti v Rossii // Pravo i zhizn'. – 2012. – # 177 (3).
3. Semenenko M.Je. Nekotorye aspekty roli instituta prisjazhnyh zasedatelej // Jekonomika i pravo. XXI vek. – 2013. – # 1.
4. Simonov D.A. Rol' advokatury v formirovanii sudejskogo korpusa v inostrannyh gosudarstvah i Rossijskoj Federacii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2011. – # 1 (20).
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
The international law of self-defense of states
Today, the escalation of military confrontation in Syria means the beginning of a slide into a new «cold war». Save the world again becomes priority task of the international community in this article, which is the third copyright material in this cycle (Maintenance of peace and security: the international legal assessment of the events in Syria. №10 (89), 2015; International law on the principle of non-use or threat of force: history and sovremennost.№10 (89), 2015), addresses the complexities of the right to self-defense in accordance with Art. 51 of the UN Charter, the classical international law recognizes only legitimate basis of self-defense Accomplished armed attack. The concept of "armed attack" is broader than «aggression». Over the past 30 years, starting with Nicaragua case in 1986, the International Court of Justice repeatedly considered questions of interpretation of the right to self-defense, guided by Article 51. (Iranian Oil Platforms (2003) Iran v USA.
Today, the escalation of military confrontation in Syria means the beginning of a slide into a new «cold war». Save the world again becomes priority task of the international community in this article, which is the third copyright material in this cycle (Maintenance of peace and security: the international legal assessment of the events in Syria. №10 (89), 2015; International law on the principle of non-use or threat of force: history and sovremennost.№10 (89), 2015), addresses the complexities of the right to self-defense in accordance with Art. 51 of the UN Charter, the classical international law recognizes only legitimate basis of self-defense Accomplished armed attack. The concept of "armed attack" is broader than «aggression». Over the past 30 years, starting with Nicaragua case in 1986, the International Court of Justice repeatedly considered questions of interpretation of the right to self-defense, guided by Article 51. (Iranian Oil Platforms (2003) Iran v USA.
But in the new geopolitical conditions discussion is reinforced the need to enhance international legal parameters of the right to self-defense military.
Keywords: non-use of force or threat of force, Article 51 of the UN Charter, the Security Council, the right to self-defense, the Definition of Aggression in 1974, an armed attack, the individual self-defense, collective self-defense, the proportionality test, preemptive (preventive) self-defense.
Work bibliographic list
1. Ashavskij B.M.K voprosu o tolkovanii stat'i 51 Ustava OON // Materialy konferencii v chest' professora kafedry mezhdunarodnogo prava juridicheskogo fakul'teta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta L.N.Galenskoj / Pod red. S.V. Bahina. – SPbGU, 2009
Work bibliographic list
1. Ashavskij B.M.K voprosu o tolkovanii stat'i 51 Ustava OON // Materialy konferencii v chest' professora kafedry mezhdunarodnogo prava juridicheskogo fakul'teta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta L.N.Galenskoj / Pod red. S.V. Bahina. – SPbGU, 2009
2. Bekjashev K.A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i gosudarstva //Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2013. − # 5(61).
3. Bulanenkov V.T., Il'in Ju.D. K razrabotke mezhdunarodno-pravovogo opredelenija agressii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1974. – # 2.
4. Vereshhetin V.S. O nekotoryh koncepcijah v sovremennoj doktrine mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo prava // Materialy konferencii v chest' professora L.N. Galenskoj /Pod red. S.V. Bahina. – SPbGU, 2009.
5. Vereshhetin V.S. Praktika mezhdunarodnogo suda OON po sporam, svjazannym s primeneniem sily / Mezhdunarodnoe pravo XXI veka. K 80-letiju professoraI.I. Lukashuka. – Kiev, 2006.
6. Galenskaja L.N. Tendencii razvitija pravovogo regulirovanija mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij v HHI vek// Materialy konferencii v chest' L.N. Galenskoj /Pod red. S.V. Bahina. – SPbGU, 2009.
7. Galenskaja L.N. Osnovnye principy mezhdunarodnogo prava: razvitie i vzaimodejstvie (na primere principa vozderzhanija ot ugrozy siloj ili ee primenenija i mirnogo razreshenija sporov) // Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Teorija i praktika. Liber amicorum v chest' professora S.V. Chernichenko. − M.,2015.
8. Denisov V.N. Organizacija Ob"edinennyh Nacij kak garant podderzhanija mira i bezopasnosti // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo XXI veka. K 80-letiju professoraI.I. Lukashuka. – Kiev, 2006.
9. Kotljar V.S. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i sovremennye strategicheskie koncepcii SShA i NATO: Avtoref.… dokt. jurid. nauk. − M., 2007.
10. Ksenofontova N.A. Narod Zimbabve. – M.: Nauka,1974.
11. Levin D.B. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i sohranenie mira. – M., 2010.
12. Lukashuk I.I. Mirovoj porjadok HHI veka // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. — 2002. − # 1.
13. Lukashuk I.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoj otvetstvennosti. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.
14. Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobennaja chast'. Tom. II. – M., 2000.
15. Maleev Ju.N. Reabilitacija adekvatnogo i proporcional'nogo primenenija sily // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2004.
16. Malinin S.A. Pravo mezhdunarodnoj bezopasnosti// Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava: v 7 t. T. 4. – M., 1989.
17. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. Uchebnik. 5-e izd. /Otvet. red. K.A. Bekjashev. – M.: Prospekt, 2008.
18. Naryshkin S.E Gosudarstvennyj perevorot v Kieve v fevrale 2014 g. i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Interv'ju. //Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2015. − # 2(81).
19. Rezoljucija General'noj Assamblei 3314 (XXIX) ot 14 dekabrja 1974 g.
20. Skakunov Je.I. Kollektivnaja bezopasnost' — garantija mirnogo sosushhestvovanija. – M.: 1962.
21. Skakunov Je.I. Samooborona v mezhdunarodnom prave.– M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 1973.
22. Tiunov O.I. Ob osobennostjah obshhepriznannyh principov i norm mezhdunarodnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo XXI veka. K 80-letiju professora I.I. Lukashuka. – Kiev, 2006.
23. Tunkin G.E. Pravo i sila v mezhdunarodnoj sisteme.− M., 1983.
24. Tunkin G.E. Teorija mezhdunarodnogo prava. – M.,1970.
25. Tupov B.S. Rodezijskij krizis. – M., 1974.
26. Farhutdinov I.Z. Evrazijskaja integracija i ispytanie ukrainskoj gosudarstvennosti v sisteme mezhdunarodnogo prava // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2014. − # 12. – S. 15-20.
27. Farhutdinov I.Z. Obespechenie mira i bezopasnosti v Evrazii (Mezhdunarodno-pravovaja ocenka sobytij v Sirii). Interv'ju s doktorom juridicheskih nauk, glavnym redaktorom Evrazijskogo juridicheskogo zhurnala Insurom Farhutdinovym// Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2015. − #10(78). – S. 8-15.
28. Farhutdinov I.Z. Rossija i Kitaj: investicionnoe sotrudnichestvo v kontekste mezhdunarodnogo prava (opyt dlja evrazijskoj integracii) // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2014. − # 5. − S. 13-25.
29. Farhutdinov I.Z. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o principe neprimenenija sily ili ugrozy siloj: istorija i sovremennost' // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. –2015. – # 11(79). – S. 34-38.
30. Fateev K.V. Obespechenie voennoj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii: teorija i praktika pravovogo regulirovanija. – M.: «Za prava voennosluzhashhih», 2005.
31. Hlestov O.N. Rossijskaja doktrina mezhdunarodnogo prava // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. –# 3(58). – S. 19-22.
32. Chernichenko S.V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. –M.: Nauchnaja kniga, 2014.
33. Chernichenko S.V. Obshhepriznannye principy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnye dogovory Rossijskoj Federacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2015. – # 8(87). – C. 21-27.
34. Chernichenko S.V. Objazatel'nost' mezhdunarodnogo prava (filosofskij aspekt) // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo: problemy i perspektivy.Liber amicorum v chest' L.N. Galenskoj / Pod red. S.V.Bahina. – SPbGU, 2007.
35. Bowett D.W. Self-Defencein International Law. L., 1958.
36. Brownlie. I. International law and the use of force by states / I. Brownlie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.p.
37. Gray and Olleson. ‘The Limits of the Law on the Use of Force: Turkey, Iraq and the Kurds’, 12 Finnish Yearbook of International Law (2001) 387.
38. Gray Christine. International Law on the Use of Forse.Third edition Oxford University Press. 2008
39. Gray ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina: Civil Waror Inter-State Conflict? Characterization and Consequences’, 67 BYIL (1996) 155; Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to GA Resolution 53/35 (1998), ‘Srebrenica’ Report.
40. Higgins. The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations (1963) at 198, 206;Waldock, ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’, 81 RCADI (1952-II).
41. International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein Edited by Michael Schmitt and Jelena Pejic. International Humanitarian Law Series Nithoff Publishers Leiden. Boston, 2007.
42. Principles of international law on the use of force by states in Self-Defence [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Research/International Law/ilpforce.doc. (data obrashhenija: 12.02.2016).
43. Resolutions and decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its fifty-fifth session. – 2000. – Vol. I.– P. 4-5.
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
International law and the US doctrine of preventive self-defense
This article, which is the fourth copyrighted material in a given cycle (Maintenance of peace and security: the international legal assessment of the events in Syria №10 (89) 2015; International law on the principle of non-use or threat of force: History and Modernity № 11. (90) 2015); The international law of self-defense States. №1 (92) 2016) are analyzed problems of the US doctrine of preventive defense in the light of the "National Security Strategy" from 2006. The preventive war in the light of the Bush Doctrine in 2003 against Iraq was the egregious blunder in American history foreign policy. Overall, Obama's foreign policy, especially no different from going from Bush's foreign policy, skillfully manipulating the doctrine of preventive self-defense, to impose a unipolar world in the international community contrary to the basic principles and norms of international law. What can cause consequences of revision of the 51st article of the UN Charter?
This article, which is the fourth copyrighted material in a given cycle (Maintenance of peace and security: the international legal assessment of the events in Syria №10 (89) 2015; International law on the principle of non-use or threat of force: History and Modernity № 11. (90) 2015); The international law of self-defense States. №1 (92) 2016) are analyzed problems of the US doctrine of preventive defense in the light of the "National Security Strategy" from 2006. The preventive war in the light of the Bush Doctrine in 2003 against Iraq was the egregious blunder in American history foreign policy. Overall, Obama's foreign policy, especially no different from going from Bush's foreign policy, skillfully manipulating the doctrine of preventive self-defense, to impose a unipolar world in the international community contrary to the basic principles and norms of international law. What can cause consequences of revision of the 51st article of the UN Charter?
Keywords: international law, the Bush doctrine, the doctrine of Schultz, global terrorism, attack, aggression, pre-emptive self-defense, preventive self-defense
Work bibliographic list
1. Bahtijar Tuzmuhamedov. Uprezhdenie siloj: «Karolina i sovremennost'» // Rossija v global'noj politike.6 maja 2002.
Work bibliographic list
1. Bahtijar Tuzmuhamedov. Uprezhdenie siloj: «Karolina i sovremennost'» // Rossija v global'noj politike.6 maja 2002.
2. Kotljar V. S. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i sovremennye strategicheskie koncepcii SShA i NATO. Avtoref.
... diss. dokt. jurid. nauk. M., 2007.
3. Marchenko M. N. Gosudarstvo i pravo v uslovijah globalizacii. M.: Prospekt, 2009.
4. Farhutdinov I. Z. Obespechenie mira i bezopasnosti v Evrazii (Mezhdunarodno-pravovaja ocenka sobytij v Sirii). Interv'ju P. N. Birjukova, S. A. Bur'janova// Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. 2015. # 10(78).
5. Agora: Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 9.7 (2003).
6. Bert V. A. Roling. The Ban on the Use of Force and the U. N. Charter, in The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force 3 (A. Cassese ed., 1986.
7. Greenwood C. “International Law and the Pre-emptive Use of Force” in 4 San Diego International Law Journal
7 (2004); D. Bowett, Self-Defense in International Law(1958) at 185-86; T. Franck, Recourse to Force (2002), 97
et seq.; and Waldock, “De Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law” in 81 RCADI
(1952).
8. Cohan John Alan. The Bush Doctrine and the Emerging Norm of Anticipatory Self-Defense in Customary International Law Pace International Law Review Volume 15. Issue 2. Fall 2003. Article 1.
9. Franck Thomas M. Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks. Cambridge, 2002.
10. Hakimi Monica. Defensive Force against Non-State Actors:TheState of Play. International Law Studies 1 (2015).
11. Brownlie I. International Law and the Use of Force Between States (1963), 275¬78; Bothe, “Terrorism and the Legality of Pre-emptive Force” in 14 EJIL (2003) no. 3, 227 and Randelzhofer, “Article 51” in B. Simma (ed.) F>e Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (2nd ed. 2002).
12. Inis Claude, Jr. Theoretical Approaches to National Security and World Order, in National Security Law 31, 36 (Mooreetal. eds., 1990).
13. International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Fault lines Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein. Edited
by Michael Schmitt and Jelena Pejic. International Humanitarian Law Series. Nith off Publishers Leiden. Boston, 2007.
14. Kritsiotis Dino. Argument of Mass Confusion // European Journal of International Law. Vol. 15 (2004).
15. Lasswell Harold D., The Garrison State, 46 Am. J. Soc. 455 (1941), reprinted in Harold D. Lasswell on Political Sociology 165. (Dwayne Marvicked, 1977).
16. Mary Ellen O’Connell The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense. The American Society of International Law. 2002
17. Mathews A. S., Albino R. C., The Permanence of the Temporary - An Examination of the 90- and 180-Day Detention Laws, 83 S. Afr. L. J. 16, 37 - 38 (1966).
18. Mc Dougal M. S. The Soviet-Cuban Quarantine and Self- Defense // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 57 (1933).
19. Nagan Winston. Hammer Craig. The New Bush National Security Doctrine and the Rule of Law // Berkeley Journal of International Law. Volume 22. Issue 3. Article 3. 2004. President George W. Bush. Address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, 38 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 1529, 1531-32 (Sept. 12, 2002).
20. Sapiro Miriam. Iraq: The Shifting Sands of Preemtive Self-Defense // American Journal of International Law.
Vol. 97 (2003).
21. Terry D. Gill. Chapter 5 The Temporal Dimension of Self-Defense: Anticipation, Pre-emption, Prevention and Immediacy//International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein Edited by Michael Schmitt and Jelena Pejic. International Humanitarian Law Series Ninth off Publishers Leiden. Boston, 2007.
22. Tony Karon, The U. S. Says the Afghanistan War Is Over. The Taliban Aren’t So Sure, Time Online Edition, May 6, 2003. [Jelektronnyjresurs]. – Rezhimdostupa: http://www.time. com/time/world/article/0,8599, 449942,00.html? cnn=yes).
23. Wedgwood Ruth. The Fall of Saddam Hussein: Security Council Mandates and Preemtive Self-Defense // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 97 (2003). P. 583.
24. Yoo John. International Law and the War in Iraq //American Journal of International Law. Vol. 97 (2003).
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Farkhutdinov I. Z.
International law on the use of military force by the state against non-state actors
The article, which is the fifth author's material in a given cycle (Ensuring of peace and security in Eurasia: the international legal assessment of the events in Syria, 10, 2015; International law on the principle of non-use of force or threat of force: History and Present.
The article, which is the fifth author's material in a given cycle (Ensuring of peace and security in Eurasia: the international legal assessment of the events in Syria, 10, 2015; International law on the principle of non-use of force or threat of force: History and Present.
11, 2015; The international law of self-defense of states number 1,2016; International law and the US doctrine of preventive sеlfdefense. 2 ,2016) reveals the international legal problems of the use military force by the state against non-state actors. Among the latter, international terrorist groups have been moved in the f irst place as the new challenges and threats The UN Charter does not preclude the implementation of preventive defense against non-state actors, but their implementation is possible only on the basis of UN Security Council decisions. In order to prevent abuse in the application of pre-emptive self-defense the study must be conducted in good faith on the basis of reliable data of current conflict. Preventive self-defense against terrorist groups must be necessary and proportionate, be within reason.
The US strategy in the field of national security in 2006 enshrines the principle of pre-emptive strike against terrorists and their supporting countries, and proclaim the possibility of unilateral US military action around the world. The goal – "expansion of freedom around the world" and the preservation of "the leading role of the United States."
Keywords: international terrorism, Art. 51 of the UN Charter, the threat to peace and security, armed attack, aggression, the inherent right of defense, preventive self-defense, "the Islamic state", the UN Security Council resolutions 1368 and 1373.
Work bibliographic list
1. Abashidze A. H. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy vmeshatel'stva // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2006. – # 1.
Work bibliographic list
1. Abashidze A. H. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy vmeshatel'stva // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2006. – # 1.
2. Batyr' V. A. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo.M.: Justicinform, 2011.
3. Bekjashev K. A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i gosudarstva // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2013. − # 5 (61).
4. Vel'jaminov G. M. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: opyty. –M.: Statut, 2015.
5. Vereshhetin V. S. O nekotoryh koncepcijah v sovremennoj doktrine mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo prava // Materialy konferencii v chest' professora kafedry mezhdunarodnogo prava juridicheskogo fakul'teta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogouniversiteta L. N. Galenskoj / Pod red. S. V. Bahina.– SPbGU, 2009.
6. Gluhen'kij S. H. Negosudarstvennye sub"ekty v mezhdunarodnom prave. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata juridicheskih nauk. – M., 2011.
7. Dovgan' E. K voprosu o pravomernosti vooruzhennyh antiterroristicheskih mer v kontekste principa nevmeshatel'stva vo vnutrennie dela gosudarstv // Belorusskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij. – 2003. – # 3.
8. Zajavlenie Rossijskoj associacii mezhdunarodnogo prava o mezhdunarodnom terrorizme // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2002. – # 2
9. Kartashkin V. A. Organizacija Ob"edinennyh Nacij i mezhdunarodnaja zashhita prav cheloveka v XXI veke. Norma. Infra – M., 2015.
10. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. T. 4 / otv. red. I. I. Lukashuk. – M., 1990.
11. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2005.
12. Lukashuk I. I. Mirovoj porjadok HHI veka // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. — 2002. − # 1.
13. Lukashuk I. I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoj otvetstvennosti. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.
14. Lukashuk I. I. Terrorizm i mezhdunarodnoe pravo //Social'nye i psihologicheskie problemy bor'by s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom. – M.: Nauka, 2002.
15. Marchenko M. N. Gosudarstvo i pravo v uslovijah globalizacii. – M.: Prospekt, 2009.
16. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Uchebnik / Otvet. red. K. A. Bekjashev. Izd. 5-e. M., 2008.
17. Naryshkin S. E Gosudarstvennyj perevorot v Kieve v fevrale 2014 g. i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Interv'ju. //Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2015. − # 2(81).
18. Sinicyna Ju. V. Pravomernost' primenenija prava na samooboronu protiv terroristicheskoj ugrozy v kontekste stat'e 51 Ustava OON // Pravo.by. — 2009.— # 4.
19. Tuzmuhamedov B. R. Predely samooborony. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ng.ru/politics/2004-09-29/2_ predel.html
20. Tuzmuhamedov B. R. Uprezhdajushhee primenenie sily: vozmozhnye kriterii dopustimosti Rossijskij ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2005. – SPb.: «Rossija-Neva», 2006.
21. Tuzmuhamedov B. R. Uprezhdenie siloj: «Karolina» i sovremennost' Rossija v global'noj politike. – 2006.– # 2.
22. Tumanov G. K. Pravomernost' obrashhenija k pravu na samooboronu v otnoshenii negosudarstvennyh faktorov v ramkah mezhdunarodnogo prava // Pravo i bezopasnost'. – 2012. – # 2.
23. Ustinov V. V. Mezhdunarodnyj opyt bor'by s terrorizmom: standarty i praktika. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2002.
24. Farhutdinov I. Z. Evrazijskaja integracija i ispytanie ukrainskoj gosudarstvennosti v sisteme mezhdunarodnogo prava // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. − 2014. − # 12.
25. Farhutdinov I. Z. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i doktrina SShA o preventivnoj samooborone // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2016. – # 2 (93).
26. Farhutdinov I. Z. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o principe neprimenenija sily ili ugrozy siloj: istorija i sovremennost' // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2015. – # 11 (90).
27. Farhutdinov I. Z. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo o samooborone gosudarstv // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2016. – # 1 (92).
28. Farhutdinov I. Z. Obespechenie mira i bezopasnosti v Evrazii (Mezhdunarodno-pravovaja ocenka sobytij v Sirii). Interv'ju P. N. Birjukova, S. A. Bur'janova// Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2015. – 10(78).
29. Hlestov O. H., Myshljaeva M. L. Vooruzhennaja bor'ba protiv mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2001. – # 4.
30. Hlestov O. N. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty bor'by s terrorizmom // Roscijskij ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. – SPb.: Rossija-Neva, 2002.
31. Chernichenko S. V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. – M.: Nauchnaja kniga, 2014.
32. Chernichenko S. V. Obshhepriznannye principy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnye dogovory Rossijskoj Federacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2015. – # 8(87).
33. Ali-Saab G. The Proper Role of International Law in Combating Terrorism // Chinese Journal of International Law. V. 1 (2002). – # 1.
34. Anthony Clark Arend& Robert J. Beck, International Law and the Use of Force: Beyond the U. N. Charter Paradigm 72-74 (1993).
35. Bali A. Stretching the Limits of International Law: The Challenge of Terrorism // 1LSA Journal of International and Comparative Law. V. 8 (Spring 2002). – # 2.
36. Bowett D. Self-Defense in International Law. London, 1958. Springer.
37. Caroline Case. [Correspondence between Great Britain and the United States of America. The Destruction of the Steamboat Caroline] Correspondence of March—April 1841—July—August 1842 // Landmark cases in Public International Law / Ed. by Eric Heinze & Malgosia Fizmaurice.
– London: Kluwer Law International, 1998.
38. Cohan John Alan. The Bush Doctrine and the Emerging Norm of Anticipatory Self-Defense in Customary International Law.
39. Dinstein Y. War, aggression and self-defense. Cambridge: GrotiusPublications, 1994.
40. Franck Thomas M. What Happens Now? The United Nations after Iraq // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 97 (2003).
41. Hakimi Monica. Defensive Force against Non-State Actors: The State of Play. International Law Studies 1 (2015).
42. John B. Mitchell. Preemptive War: Is It Constitutional? Santa Clara Law Review Volume 44. Number 2. Article 3 P.5131-1-2004
43. Louis Rene Beres, On International Law and Nuclear Terrorism, 24 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 1, 31 (1994).
44. Mary Ellen O’Connell. The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense. The American Society of International Law. 2002
45. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v.U. S.). 1986 I. C.J. 4, 100).
46. Murphy S. D. Terrorism and the concept of “Armed Attack” in Article 51 of the UN Charter // Harvard International Law Journal. Winter 2002. V. 43(1).
47. Nagan Winston. Hammer Craig. The New Bush National Security Doctrine and the Rule of Law // Berkeley Journal of International Law. Volume 22. Issue 3. Article 3. – 2004
48. Ratner S. R. Notes and Comments // American Journal of International Law. V. 96 (2003). # 4.
49. Sapiro Miriam. Iraq: The Shifting Sands of Preemtive Self-Defense // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 97 (2003).
50. Stromseth Jane E. Law and Force after Iraq: a Transitional Moment // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 97 (2003).
51. Terry D. Gill. The Temporal Dimension of Self-Defense: Anticipation, Pre-emption, Prevention and Immediacy. Chapter 5. // International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Fault lines Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein Edited by Michael Schmitt and Jelena Pejic. International Humanitarian Law Series Ninth off Publishers Leiden. Boston, 2007