LAW OF CIS
Schinkarezkaya G.G.
About the Economic court оf the Commonwealth of Independent States The Economic Court of Justice, under the Charter of the CIS, authorized to settle disputes arising from the economic relations between States. However, the Court did not in fact a judicial institution, because neither the Court nor its members are not independent. Therefore, the Economic Court is ineffective and can not be effective.
Key words: International court of justice, interstate disputes, Commonwealth of Independent States, judicial procedure, jurisdiction of the court.

 

EURASIAN INTEGRATION
Mishalchenko Y.V.
Eurasian Economic Community: present status and prospects This article discusses the general characteristics of the Eurasian Economic Community as a supranational organization to develop a common foreign trade policy, tariffs, prices and other components of the functioning of the common market of the Member States.
Key words: the right of countries to the CIS, foreign economic policy, the Eurasian Economic Community.

 

LAW OF CIS STATES
Salmanova S.S.
Reflection of sources of international law in system of sources of criminal law of Azerbaijan Republic
Modern national legal systems with development of globalization process, not depending on their relation to this or that legal family, it is more and more integrated to the international legal system. It demands development of conceptually new mechanism of interaction of the international and national right, including criminal, is especial in the questions concerning definition of a circle of its sources. This article discusses reflection of sources of international law in system of sources of criminal law of the Azerbaijan Republic.
Key words: sources of international law, sources of criminal law of Azerbaijan Republic.
Work bibliographic list 1. Brounli JA. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – M.,1977. – Kn. 1–2. 2. Gaverdovskij A.S. Implementacija norm mezhdunarodnogo prava. – Kiev, 1980. 3. Zimnenko B.L. Soglasovanie norm vnutrigosudarstvennogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoj sisteme Rossii // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2000. – № 4. 4. Krutikov L.L. Problemy teorii ugolovnogo prava: Izbrannye stat'i (1982–1999 gg.). –JAroslavl', 1999. 5. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo: Ucheb.posob. / Pod obw. red. V.N.Kudrjavceva. – 2-eizd., pererab. i dop. – M., 1999. 6. Naumov A.V. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo:Obwaja chast': Kurs lekcij. – 2-e izd., pererab. I dop. – M., 2000. 7. Neznamova Z.A., Birjukov P.N. Problemy vzaimodejstvija ugolovnyh norm // Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 1998. – № 2. 8. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda RF № 5 ot 10 oktjabrja 2003 g. ≪O primenenii sudami obwej jurisdikcii obwepriznannyh principov i norm mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov Rossijskoj Federacii≫ // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2003. – 2 dekabrja. 9. Samandarov F.JU. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obwaja chast': Uchebnik. – Baku: JUrid. lit., 2002. 10. Samedov M.N. Vypolnenie mezhdunarodnogo prava v jurisdikcii gosudarstva. – Baku, 2002. 11. Truncevskij JU.V. Normy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava kak istochnik rossijskogo ugolovnogo prava. – Rjazan', 1997. 12. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obwaja chast': Uchebnik /Pod red. N.I.Vetrova, JU.I.Ljapunova. – M, 1997. 13. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii: Obwaja chast': Uchebnik / Pod red. R.R.Galiakbarova. – Saratov, 1997. 14. Ugolovnoe pravo: CHast' Obwaja: Uchebnik / Pod obwej red. L.D.Gauhmana, A.M.Kolodkina i S.V.Maksimova. – M., 1999. 15. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii: Obwaja chast': Uchebnik / Pod red. B.V.Zdravomyslova. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M., 2000. 16. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: Uchebnik: V.2 t. – T. 1. Obwaja chast' / Otv. red. A.N.Ignatov, JU.A.Krasikov. – M., 2000. 17. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii: Obwaja chast': Uchebnik / Pod red. A.I.Raroga. – 2-e izd. – M., 1998.

LAW REFORM Aivar L.K.
The crisis of criminal policy
The article based on an analysis of the history of the development of criminal legislation of Russia and foreign states, as well as modern legal norms contained in the Criminal Code dealt with the problem of showing that the Russian crisis of the modern criminal policy.
Key words: criminal law, criminal policy, criminal punishmen.
Work bibliographic list 1. Mathiesen Thomas. Prison on Trial. – Winchester: Waterside Press, 2006. 2. Gernet M.N. V.tjur'me: Ocherki tjuremnoj psihologii. – B. m.: JUr. Izdat Ukrainy, 1930. 3. Gilinskij JA . Ugolovnaja politika Rossijskoj Federacii // Indeks: Dos'e na cenzuru. – 2003. – № 18. 4. Kristi N. Predely nakazanija. – M., 1985; Bor'ba s prestupnost'ju kak industrija: Vpered k GULAG ’u zapadnogo obrazca. – M., 2001; Priemlemoe kolichestvo prestuplenij. – SPb., 2006. 5. CHezare Bekkaria. O.prestuplenijah i nakazanijah. – M., 1995.

 

THEORY OF STATE AND LAW
Vasilyev A.A.
Legal doctrine – source of Russian law: theoretically questions
The article is devoted to researching legal doctrine as a source of Russian law. The author on the base of legal acts, historical information considered that legal doctrine must sanctions power. In the issue recommended in the project about sources of Russian law give to the legal doctrine law force.
Key words: source of law, shape of law, legal doctrine, legal science, legal system.
Work bibliographic list 1. Alekseev S.S. Tajna prava. Ego ponimanie, naznachenie, social'naja cennost'. – M.: Norma, 2001. 2. Arbitrazhno-processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14 ijunja 2002 g. // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2002. – № 137 (27 ijulja). 3. Boshno S.V. Doktrina kak forma i istochnik prava // ZHurnal Rossijskogo Prava. – 2003. – № 12. – S. 79. 4. Velichko A .M. Gosudarstvennye idealy Rossii i Zapada. Paralleli pravovyh kul'tur. – SPb.: Izd-vo jurid. instituta, 1999. 5. Vestnik Konstitucionnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii. – 1993. – № 4–5. 6. Vinogradov P .G. Ocherki po teorii prava. – M., 1915. 7. Gaj. Institucii / Per. s lat. F. Dadinskogo; pod red. V.A. Savel'eva. – M., 1997. 8. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (ch. 3) ot 26 nojabrja 2001 g.// SZ R F. – 2001. –№ 49. – St. 4552. 9. Granat N.L. Istochniki prava // JUrist. – 1998. – № 9. 10. Grimm D. K.voprosu o ponjatii i istochnike objazatel'nosti juridicheskih norm // ZHurnal Ministerstva JUsticii. – 1896. – Ijun'. 11. Digesty JUstiniana: Izbrannye fragmenty / Per. i prim. I.S. P ereterskogo. – M., 1984. 12. Zaharov A .L. Mezhotraslevye principy prava. – Samara, 2004. 13. Istochniki rossijskogo prava: voprosy teorii i istorii: Ucheb. posob. / Otv. red. M.N. Marchenko. – M.: Norma, 2005. 14. Kalamkarjan R .A. Mesto doktriny naibolee kvalificirovannyh specialistov po publichnomu pravu razlichnyh nacij v istochnikovoj baze sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava// Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2006. – № 4. 15. Kononov K .A. Ideologija kak juridicheskaja kategorija: teoreticheskie problemy // Stabil'nost' i dinamizm obwestvennyh otnoshenij v Rossijskoj Federacii: pravovye aspekty:Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii / Otv. red. V.JA. Muzjukin. – Barnaul: Altajskij gos. un-t, 2005. 16. Korkunov N.M. Lekcii po obwej teorii prava. – SPb.: JUridicheskij centr Press, 2004. 17. Marchenko M.N. Istochniki prava. – M.:Velbi, 2005. – S. 32–54. 18. Neshataeva T .N. K.voprosu ob istochnikah prava – sudebnom precedente i doktrine // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda. – 2000. –№ 5. 19. Ovod A .V. Princip zakonnosti v publichnom prave: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. –Kazan', 2005. 20. Puhan I., Polenak-Akimovskaja M. Rimskoe pravo. – M.: Zercalo, 2000. 21. Puhta G .F. JEnciklopedija prava // Antologija mirovoj pravovoj mysli: V.5 t. – T. III. Evropa. Amerika: XVII–XX vv. – M.: Mysl', 1999. 22. Razumovich. N.N. Istochniki i forma prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1988. – № 3. 23. Semejnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 8 dekabrja 1995 g. // SZ R F. – 1996. – № 1. – St.16. 24. Sorokin V .V. Istochniki perehodnogo prava // Lichnost' i gosudarstvo na rubezhe vekov. – Barnaul: Altajskij gos. un-t, 2000. 25. Sorokin V .V. Koncepcija jevoljucionnyh preobrazovanij pravovyh sistem v perehodnyj period. – Barnaul: Altajskij gos. un-t, 2002. 26. Sorokin V .V. Ponjatie i suwnost' prava v duhovnoj kul'ture Rossii. – M., 2007. 27. Socuro L .V. Neoficial'noe tolkovanie norm prava: Ucheb. posob. – M., 2000. 28. Spravochnik po normotvorcheskoj tehnike: Per. s nem. – M.: Bek, 2002. 29. Statut Mezhdunarodnogo suda OON 1945 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo: Sbornik dokumentov. – M., 1996. – T. 1. 30. Uolker R. Anglijskaja sudebnaja sistema. – M.: JUrid. lit., 1980. 31. Hvostov V .M. Obwaja teorija prava. JEle- mentarnyj ocherk. – M., 1914. 32. Hutyz M.H. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo. – M.: Bylina, 2002. 33. Cvajgert K., Ketc H. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. – M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 1998. – T. 1. 34. CHerdancev A .F. Tolkovanie prava i dogovora. – M., 2003. 35. SHugrina E .S. Tehnika juridicheskogo pis'ma: Ucheb.-prakt. posob. – M.: Delo, 2000.

THEORY OF STATE AND LAW
Litvinovich F.F.
About the question of continuity role in evolution of Law
Continuity in the Law, as an internal mechanism for development of the law itself, the mechanism of a new (progressive only in the view of social actor, showing the right), a new, which grows on the basis of synthesis multi acts denial and «withdrawals», is not limited to the present and past, and includes a ratio of the future, present and past, for the legislative action sought to the future, guided by perceptions of it as the aim of the present, each time taking on a new and applying the previous legal experience. The interpretation of the individual authors of this relationship in the law to the past, the right attitude as an absolute withdrawal of the last real leads to an underestimation of the history of law, to assert the impossibility of development rights, for the emergence of this law in his past would have lost his self, to apply to him no longer have any meaning, as it is understood modernity and exhausted.
Key words: continuity of social continuity, the continuity of the right.
Work bibliographic list
1. Alekseev S.S. Teorija prava. – M.: BEK,1994. 2. Babaev V .K. Sovetskoe pravo kak logicheskaja sistema. – M., 1978. 3. Vengerov A .B. Teorija gosudarstva i prava. –CH. II. Teorija prava. – M.: JUrist#, 1996. – T. 1. 4. Vesti MGU . – 1978. – № 1. – (Pravo). 5. Kerimov D.A. Metodologicheskie funkcii filosofii prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. –1995. – № 9. – S. 15. 6. Malikova I .P. Filosofija pravotvorchestva. – Ekaterinburg, 1996. 7. Pokrovskij I .A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. – 3-e izd., stereotipnoe. – M.: Statut, 2001. 8. Problemy juridicheskoj tehniki: Sbornik statej / Pod red. V.M. Baranova. – N. Nov- gorod, 2000. 9. Solov'ev V.S. Soch.: V.2 t. – M., 1988. – T. 2. 10. Harin JU.A. Dialektika social'nogo otricanija. – Mn.: Izd-vo BGU , 1972. 11. SHvekov G .V. Preemstvennost' v prave. – M., 1983. 12. SHeptulin A .P. Dialekticheskij metod poznanija. – M.: Politizdat, 1983. 13. SHeptulin A .P. K ategorii dialektiki kak otrazhenie zakonomernostej razvitija. – M.:Znanie, 1980. – S. 50.  

THEORY OF STATE AND LAW
Kalinin A.Yu.
The religious values of Russian society and the process saw-formation
In the article the author touches upon the following questions: a) the influence of Orthodox Church on feeling for law and order, b) the distortion of orthodox dogma by mythological outlook in the history of Russian state, c) the confrontation of different religious values in the history of Russian politics, d) the interrelation of religious and scientific feeling for law and order, e) the religious values in the modern law culture in Russia.
Key words: religion, law, justice, law genesis.
Work bibliographic list
1. Aleksandr Velikij. – M.: AST.H ranitel',2007. 2. Alekseev N.N. Russkij narod i gosudarstvo. – M., 1998. 3. Antonovich V. Issledovanija o kazachestve. – SPb., 2000. 4. Berdjaev N.A. Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obwestvennost'. – M., 1999. 5. Berdjaev N.A. Russkaja ideja. – M., 2005. 6. Vajl' P. Mir sovetskogo cheloveka. – M.,1995. 7. Velichko A .M. Filosofija russkoj gosudarstvennosti. – SPb., 2003. 8. D'jakonov P. Vlast' moskovskih gosudarej. – SPb., B.g. 9. D'jakonov P., Hruwov V. Issledovanija o sochinenijah Ivana Sanina. – SPb., 1866. 10. Il'in I .A. Obwee uchenie o prave i gosudarstve // Il'in I.A. Soch. – T. 4. – M., 1994. 11. Isaev I .A., Zolotuhina N.M. Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij Rossii. – M.,1995. 12. Kalinin A .JU. Teoreticheskie podhody k rassmotreniju istochnika prava kak faktora pravoobrazovanija // Politika, vlast', pravo: Sbornik nauchnyh statej / Pod red. S.A. K omarova. – SPb., 2008. – № 2. 13. Kalinin A .JU. Kategorija ≪istochnik prava≫ v dorevoljucionnom i sovremennom otechestvennom pravoponimanii // Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii.– 2005. – № 4. 14. Kalinin A .JU. Sootnoshenie ponjatij lichnosti i gosudarstva v antichnoj filosofii //Socium: problemy, analiz, integracii: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Vyp. 3. – M.: MPGU , 2004. 15. Kalinin A .JU. JEtimologicheskie aspekty pravoponimanija // Problemy jekonomiki i prava: Sbornik nauchnyh statej. – CH. 4. – Kolomna: KI.MG.OU, 2004. 16. Kalinin A .JU., Komarov S.A. Forma (istochnik) prava kak kategorija v teorii gosudarstva i prava // Pravovedenie. –2000. –№ 6. 17. Kara-Murza S.G. Sovetskaja civilizacija. – Har'kov: Belgorod, 2007. 18. Kistjakovskij B.A. Filosofija i sociologija prava. –SPb., 1998. 19. Mommzen T. Istorija Rima: V.5 t. –M., 2001. –T. 5. 20. Moskovskaja Rus' v vospominanijah inostrancev. –M., 1995. 21. Prugavin A .S. O.L 've Tolstom i tolstovcah. –M., 1911. 22. Solov'ev V . Vizantizm i Rossija // Vizantizm i slavjanstvo: velikij spor. –M., 2001. 23. Spektorskij E .V. Hristianstvo i pravovaja kul'tura // Istorija filosofii prava. – SPb., 1998. 24. Spektorskij E .V. Hristianstvo i pravovaja kul'tura // Filosofija prava. –SPb., 1998. 25. Ustljarov N. Skazanija kn. Kurbskogo. – SPb., 1842. 26. Florenskij P .A. Predpolagaemoe gosudarstvennoe ustrojstvo v buduwem // Florenskij P.A. Soch.: V.4 t. –T. 2. –M., 1995.

COMMERCIAL LAW
Korablev O.G.
Legal means of decrease in risk in enterprise activity
In article the problem of legal means of decrease in risk in business is investigated. Criteria of reference of   those or other legal means to means of decrease in risk come to light. In a science of the general theory of the right there were some points of view concerning legal means as patrimonial concept in general, and their kind – legal means of decrease in risk – in particular. In this connection three approaches are estimated: «activity», «institutional», “instrumentalno-technological”. The conclusion that legal means of decrease in risk should be considered from the point of view of “the instrumentalnotechnological approach» becomes. Legal means of decrease in risk can be divided into groups as such division concretizes separate kinds of legal means, promoting revealing of actually legal aspect of the specified question. Besides, as a result of such division it is obviously possible to isolate those legal means which can be used as legal means of decrease in risk in enterprise activity. As the basic legal means of decrease in risk the law and the contract is considered.
Key words: the right, means, risk, the businessman, decrease, the law, the contract
Work bibliographic list
1. Agarkov M.M. Ocherki kreditnogo prava. – M., 1926. 2. Alekseev S.S. Pravovye sredstva: postanovka problemy, ponjatie, klassifikacii //Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1987. – № 11. 3. Alekseev S.S. Teorija prava. – M.: BEK,1995. 4. Mal'ko A .V. Pravovye sredstva kak obweteoreticheskaja problema // Pravovedenie. –1999. – № 2. 5. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava: Ucheb. posob. / Pod red. M.N. Marchenko. – M.: JUrist', 2001. 6. Medvedev D.A. Kodifikacija rossijskogo chastnogo prava: Sbornik statej / Pod red.D.A. Medvedeva. – M.: Statut, 2008. 7. Puginskij B.I. Issledovanie jeffektivnosti grazhdansko-pravovyh sredstv // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. – 1977. – № 6. – (Pravo). 8. Puginskij B.I. Pravovye sredstva obespechenija jeffektivnosti proizvodstva. – M.,1980. 9. Puginskij B.I. Teorija i praktika dogovornogo regulirovanija. – M.: IKD ≪Zercalo-M≫, 2008. 10. Sapun V .A. Instrumental'naja teorija prava v juridicheskoj nauke // Sovremennoe gosudarstvo i pravo. Voprosy teorii i istorii. –Vladivostok, 1992. 11. Syryh V .M. Istinnost' i pravil'nost' kak kriterii teoreticheskoj jeffektivnosti norm prava // JEffektivnost' zakona / Pod red. JU.A. Tihomirova. – M., 1997. 12. SHundikov K .V. JUridicheskie sredstva realizacii pravovoj politiki // Pravovedenie. – 1997. – № 4.

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LAW
Kozheurov Ya.S.
The Freedom of Mass-media: European Court’s on Human Rights Standarts
According to the Court’s well-established case-law, freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions for its progress and each individual’s selffulfilment. It is applicable not only to «information» or «ideas» that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb. The press fulfils an essential function in a democratic society. Although it must not overstep certain bounds, particularly as regards the reputation and rights of others and the need to prevent the disclosure of confidential information, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest. Not only does it have the task of imparting such information and ideas: the public also has a right to receive them. Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of «public watchdog». Journalistic freedom covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation. This freedom is subject to the exceptions set out in Article 10 § 2 of the Convention, which must, however, be construed strictly. The need for any restrictions must be established convincingly. The limit of acceptable criticism is wider with regard to a politician acting in his public capacity than in relation to a private individual, as the former inevitably and knowingly lays himself open to close scrutiny of his every word and deed by both journalists and the public at large, and he must display a greater degree of tolerance. One factor of particular importance for the Court’s determination is the distinction between statements of fact and value judgments. While the existence of facts can be demonstrated, the truth of value judgments is not susceptible of proof. The requirement to prove the truth of a value judgment is impossible to fulfil and infringes freedom of opinion itself, which is a fundamental part of the right secured by Article 10.
Key words: freedom of expression; defamation; European Court’s on Human Rights case law.

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LAW
Konyukhova (Umnova) I.A.
The formation and development of the law of Peace as integrated industry law in a modern threats to humanity
The article based on an analysis of scientific and educational literature, international and domestic legal issues of forming and development of the law of peace as an integral part of the domestic legal system and the system of international law.
Key words: international law, law of peace, law of war conflicts.
Work bibliographic list
1. Dejstvujuwee mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – M.: Moskovskij nezavisimyj institut mezhdunarodnogo prava, 1997. – T. 3. – S. 90–94. 2. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. – M.: JUrajt, 2007. 3. Prava cheloveka i vooruzhennye konflikty: Uchebnik. – M., 2001. 4. Sbornik dejstvujuwih dogovorov, soglashenij i konvencij, zakljuchennyh SSSR s inostrannymi gosudarstvami. – Vyp. XXVII. – M.,1974. 5. SHumilov V .M. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i Global'naja pravovaja sistema // Moskovskijzhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava.– 2002. – № 10. 6. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute // Year Book 2002: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. – Oxford, 2002. – P. 72.

ANTITERRORIST LAW
Aliev I.M.
The problem of terrorism in sociopolitical processes: politological analysis This article is about of analysis of terrorism problem in the sociopolitical processes. Wellknown that terrorist strategy cannot operate without strengthening effect of publicity. Acts of terrorism are quite often inverted to those whom strategists of terrorism count potentially interested object.
Key words: criminal, terrorism, sociopolitical processes
Work bibliographic list
1. Antologija mirovoj politicheskoj mysli: V.5 t. – T. II. Zarubezhnaja politicheskaja mysl'. HH v. – M.: Mysl', 1997. 2. Bol'shoj juridicheskij slovar'. – M.: INFRA -M, 1999. 3. Obwaja teorija nacional'noj bezopasnosti. – M.: RAG S, 2005. 4. Ol'shanskij D.P. Psihologija terrorizma. – SPb.: ID Piter, 2002. 5. Politicheskij menedzhment. – M.: Izd-vo Instituta psihoterapii, 2004. 6. Politologija: JEnciklopedicheskij slovar'. – M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Kommercheskogo un-ta, 1993. 7. Politologija: Hrestomatija. – M.: Gardariki, 1999. 8. JEnciklopedicheskij juridicheskij slovar'. – M.: INFRA -M, 1999. 9. Piriyev A. Siyasi strategiya ve mili tehlukesizlik problemi. – Bakı: BDU, 2002. 10. Politologiya: ensiklopedik luğet. – Bakı: Guneş, 2008. 11. Siyasi biliklerin Esasları. – Bakı: Ulu, 1999.

 

INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW
Belyaeva N.G. Bondarchuk N.A.
The legal nature of transnational corporation
In article are investigated theoretical questions about presence a plenty treatments of the term «transnational corporation». The opinion that today there is a huge quantity of treatments of concept «transnational corporation», but any of them does not take into account the real situation which has developed in the world. The special attention is given to studying of theories and scientific concepts which cover those or other sides activity of transnational corporations, but they do not open the nature of transnational corporation full-scale. In work is spoken also about criteria which allow to attribute this or that corporation to transnational corporations and about classification of transnational corporations. In clause is judged that in the Russian legislation there are no legal treatments of concepts «corporation» and «transnational corporation».
Key words: transnational corporation, the subject of law, parent enterprise, branch establishment.
Work bibliographic list
1. Anufrieva L .P. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Osobennaja chast'. – M., 2002. – T. 2. 2. Asoskov A .V. Metody chastnopravovogo regulirovanija statusa kommercheskih organizacij, dejstvujuwih na territorii inostrannyh gosudarstv // Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. – M., 2002. 3. Asoskov A .V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovanija transnacional'nyh kompanij //JUridicheskij mir. – 2000. – № 8. 4. Bratus' S.N. JUridicheskie lica v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. – M., 1947. 5. Vladimirova I .G. Rol' i mesto transnacional'nyh korporacij v sovremennoj jekonomike // Korporativnyj menedzhment. – 1998. –№ 2. 6. Inshakova A .O. Transnacional'naja korporacija: chastnopravovoj aspekt // Materialy nauchnoj sessii. – Volgograd, 2003. – Vyp. 1.Pravo. 7. Kashanina T .V. Korporativnoe pravo (Pravo hozjajstvennyh tovariwestv i obwestv): Uchebnik dlja vuzov. – M., 1999. 8. Kostenkov I. Sovmestnye kompanii v mezhdunarodnoj delovoj praktike. – M., 1982. 9. Kurickij A .B. Transnacional'nye korporacii v informacionnom obwestve. – SPb.,1998. 10. Lunc L .A. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: Osobennaja chast'. – M., 2002. – T. 2. 11. Mil'ner B.Z., Olejnik I .S., Rotenko S.A. JAponskij paradoks. – M., 1985. 12. Mironov A .A. Koncepcija razvitija transnacional'nyh korporacij. – M., 1981. 13. Potapov V .A., Lazarev V .V. Korporacii i ih vidy v rossijskoj pravovoj prirode //Vneshnetorgovoe pravo. – 2006. – № 2. 14. Son'kin N.B. Korporacii: teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy. – M., 1999. – 288 s. 15. Hvostov V .M. Sistema rimskogo prava. – M., 1996. 16. Weglov S.S. Regulirovanie dejatel'nosti transnacional'nyh korporacij // JUrist. –2007. –

 

QUESTION OF HISTORY
Shahidov A.Sh.
Russia and Turkey: from wars up to alliance
This article is discusses of brief history of the mutual relations between Russia and Turkey. Russia and Turkey have been competitors during some centuries. This rivalry was resulting in long wars in some cases. Ambitions of these states were growing on the ideology of national hegemony. But ideas and stereotypes in the past change its place with rational schemes and pragmatic moves, arisen in the period of political realism, in the result the level of mutual relations rises and it changes tactical unity into the strategically partnership.
Key words: Russia and Turkey relations, foreign policy, strategically interests.
Work bibliographic list
1. Official web-site of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Republic of Turkey – www.mfa.gov.tr. 2. Official web-site of Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry for Foreign Affairs – www. dipacademy.ru. 3. Official web-site of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russian Federation – www.mid.ru. 4. Transcript of Remarks and Response to Questions by Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov at Joint Press Conference Following Talks with Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmed Davutoglu, Moscow, July 2, 2009. 5. The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation – Approved by Dmitry A. Medvedev, President of the Russian Federation, on 12 July 2008; 6. National Security Concept of the RussianFederation – Approved by Presidential Decree No.24 of 10 January 2000. 7. Synopsis of the Turkish Foreign Policy –http://www.mfa.gov.tr/synopsis-of-the-turkishforeign- policy.en.mfa; 8. Sakallioglu, Cizre. The Anatomy of the Turkish Military’s Autonomy, Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 2, 1997, pp. 157-158. 9. Momayezi, Nasser. “Civil-military relations in Turkey”, International Journal on World Peace. New York: Sep 1998. Vol. 15, Iss. 3., p. 3. 10. Ersel Aydinli, Nihat Ali Ozcan, and Dogan Akyaz (January/February 2006). “The TurkishMilitary’s March Toward Europe”. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved on 2008-12-16. № 12.  

The norms of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, providing grounds and forms of intervention of bodies of guardianship into relations between parents and children, are analyzed in the article. The author defines criteria, by which guardianship bodies manage, and legal consequences of such intervention.